Indeed:
They are both about the same size, and both, in my photos, pointing in the same direction. Otherwise they could hardly be more different.
On the left, a footbridge which forms part of the walk from the downstream footbridge beside Hungerford Bridge, which enables you to carry on walking a bit above ground until you get to Charing Cross Station. This is one of my favourite walks in all of London, perhaps partly because it is so very short.
And on the right, the footbridge across Floral Street that connects the Royal Ballet School to the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden. This is not one of my favourite walks in London, despite being very short, because I can think of no way that I’d ever be allowed to walk this walk. I used to work in a bookshop that started out in Floral Street and then moved but only around the corner, so I used to see this little bridge often. I wondered how one might contrive actually walking across it and I still do. Getting to know some ballerinas would be a start, but only, I suspect, a start. Maybe they permit occasional tours at prearranged times, but I doubt it.
Both these photos were photoed early in 2004, with my Canon A70. This was around the time when I was just beginning to get the hang of how to photo London in a way that I liked.
I’m pretty sure I have shown these photos, or photos a lot like them, before, on one of my various blogs. No matter. These bridges are nice enough for me to be able to repeat myself about how nice they are.
I do like bridges between buildings. They seem to feature a lot in science fiction art, which I also like. e.g.: https://ingmaralbizu.com/great-cities-in-science-fiction/ (I have only looked at the pictures in that article, not read the words).
Connecting modern buildings with tunnels seems to be much more common – it’s just much less visible.
Not only you’ve shown the photos, but you pointed to me the footbridge itself – when I joined you for a walk, all those years ago when I visited London.
Thank you, again!